Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Bol Asoc Med P R ; 108(1): 9-11, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29192749

RESUMO

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimate that nearly 500,000 surgical site infections (SSIs) occur annually.[3] SSIs remain a substantial cause of morbidity and mortality among hospitalized patients. For this reason, we developed a quality assessment study with a perioperative antibiotic protocol that included antibiotic type, weight dependent dose, and intraoperative re-dosing regime for the proper administration of prophylaxis antibiotics prior to orthopedic surgery. We restricted our study to knee replacement and hip replacement surgeries. All records from September 2014 to June 2015 were taken into consideration (78 cases). Before February 2015 (protocol implementation date), only 33% or 13 of 39 cases were correctly dosed. After protocol establishment: 44 % or 17 of 39 cases were correctly dosed. Although our p-value suggests no statistical significance, there was an increasing trend of adequate antibiotic administration. In conclusion, we need to educate more our nursing staff and implement monthly audits of our cases to improve our mistakes and ensure that this aspect of practice will remain in the forefront of perioperative orthopedic surgery care.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibioticoprofilaxia/métodos , Artroplastia de Quadril/métodos , Artroplastia do Joelho/métodos , Humanos , Assistência Perioperatória/métodos , Assistência Perioperatória/normas , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle
2.
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil ; 5(3): 131-7, 2014 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25360344

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: There are risk factors associated with mortality in patients older than 70 years with hip fracture, including kidney function. However, indirect formulas to calculate glomerular filtration rate are not validated in patients older than 70 years. We analyzed whether the formula hematocrit, urea, and gender (HUGE) can be used as a prognostic factor. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 88 patients older than 70 years with a diagnosis of hip fracture. At admission, clinical and biochemical parameters were measured and glomerular filtration rate by Cockcroft-Gault, Modification Of Diet In Renal Disease (MDRD), Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI), and HUGE value. Accuracy to assess long-term mortality was analyzed with receiver-operating curve analysis. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify risk factor for mortality. RESULTS: Sample included 88 patients; overall mortality was 13.63%, 17.85%, 28.57%, and 75.85% at 6 months, 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. There was no significant difference in glomerular filtration rate by different formulas, contrary to HUGE, with higher values in the mortality group (1.83 ± 6.38 vs -2.61 ± 2.70, P = .0001). Survival was lower in patients with higher HUGE values (22.7 months, 95% confidence interval [CI] 16.1-29.5 vs 32.9 months, 95% CI 30.2-35.7; P ≤ .001). In the Cox regression analysis, a negative HUGE value is associated with lower mortality (hazards ratio = 0.238; 95% CI 0.568-0.099). CONCLUSION: The HUGE formula is an independent risk factor for mortality in elderly patients with hip fracture, but not the glomerular filtration rate determined by Cockcroft-Gault, MDRD, and CKD-EPI.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...